Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-04-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-04-12 House Journal Page 2921 HB 65 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 2918) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 65(FIN) "An Act relating to breaches of security involving personal information, credit report and credit score security freezes, protection of social security numbers, care of records, disposal of records, identity theft, credit cards, and debit cards, and to the jurisdiction of the office of administrative hearings; amending Rules 60 and 82, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 65(FIN) am S "An Act relating to breaches of security involving personal information, credit report and credit score security freezes, protection of social security numbers, care of records, disposal of records, identity theft, credit cards, and debit cards, disclosure of the names and addresses of permanent fund dividend applicants, and to the jurisdiction of the office of administrative hearings; amending Rules 60 and 82, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 35 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 65(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSHB 65(FIN) am S. 2008-04-12 House Journal Page 2922 The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 65(FIN)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 65(FIN) am S Concur YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Chenault, Foster And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 65(FIN) am S. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 65(FIN) am S was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.